The listed equity asset classes are managed with an approach that aims to provide meaningfully less carbon-intensive exposure versus the respective benchmarks (calculated on MSCI Analytics on scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity levels).

Our listed equity carbon intensity restrictions apply to direct listed equities across our investment options.

We have mandated our listed equity investment managers to manage their portfolios subject to an annual carbon budget which is defined with respect to carbon intensity (measured as the ratio of emissions to sales calculated on MSCI Analytics on scope 1 and 2 carbon intensity levels).

For each manager, the carbon budget is expressed as a meaningful discount to the carbon intensity of the manager’s benchmark. This is the maximum level of carbon intensity for the manager’s overall portfolio. This means that managers can still look for opportunities for mispriced stocks across their respective stock universe, and all stocks can compete for a place in the portfolio, but there is an additional hurdle for highly carbon intensive companies.

The budget for each manager has been customised recognising each strategy’s typical opportunity set.

Carbon intensity is a measure of emissions versus sales, which is a simple proxy of how exposed a company’s own operations are to carbon risk. We express the carbon budget for each manager as a discount to the benchmark’s carbon intensity. The discount level determines how much carbon each manager can allocate to each portfolio. The Australian listed equity asset class has a total discount of around 30%, while the international listed equity asset class has a total discount of around 60%. The discount is higher for international equities as it is easier to construct a portfolio that has lower emissions as the stock concentration is low relative to Australian equities.

It should be noted that there may be exceptions as managers can request to move to a position above the maximum allowable level of carbon intensity. Exceptions may be approved by Vision Super if a manager can make a sufficiently strong argument that its portfolio could breach its carbon budget and still be consistent with the transition to net zero. For example, if a manager wished to invest in a cement company that was a leader in a low or no emissions production technology that was likely to be important in moving to a net zero outcome.